Jimmy Carter’s Final Lesson

Jimmy Carter lived to be 100 years old—an achievement few of us will ever claim. But as the world reflects on his life, there’s one chapter of his presidency that remains both a triumph and a cautionary tale: the normalization of relations between the United States and China.

It’s a story of ambition, pragmatism, and powerful personalities on both sides of the Pacific. And, if we look closely, it offers some hard truths about leadership, the art of delegation, and the long game of global politics.

Let’s peel back the layers on Carter’s China legacy—starting with the key players who made it happen and ending with what it means for the future of American leadership.

The Man Behind the Desk (Or Was He?)

When you think of Jimmy Carter, words like “earnest” and “well-meaning” come to mind. But when it comes to his role in normalizing relations with China, “inept” might be closer to the mark.

Carter wasn’t the mastermind behind this geopolitical coup. That credit belongs to a cast of sharp, driven diplomats and advisors—names like Zbigniew Brzezinski and Cyrus Vance—who often worked around Carter’s indecision to push the United States closer to Beijing.

By January 1, 1979, when the United States officially recognized the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Carter had essentially greenlit plans laid down by his predecessors and orchestrated by his team. The heavy lifting? That came from the people in the room who knew how to play the game.

Nixon and Kissinger: Laying the Groundwork

Before Carter even stepped into the Oval Office, the seeds of U.S.-China rapprochement had been sown by President Richard Nixon and his National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger.

Nixon’s groundbreaking 1972 visit to Beijing marked the first step in thawing relations between the two nations, driven by a shared interest in countering Soviet influence. Kissinger’s secret diplomacy laid the foundation for future negotiations, as he engaged in delicate talks to bridge the ideological and geopolitical chasm between the U.S. and the PRC.

Their efforts set the stage for Carter’s administration to finalize the process of normalization, proving that diplomatic breakthroughs often require years of groundwork and multiple administrations to bring to fruition.

Brzezinski: The Grandmaster

Zbigniew Brzezinski, Carter’s hawkish National Security Advisor, approached U.S.-China normalization like a grandmaster maneuvering on the Cold War chessboard.

A Polish émigré with an unrelenting focus on weakening the Soviet Union, Brzezinski viewed China as the perfect geopolitical counterweight to Moscow. His goal was clear: position China as a counterweight to the Soviet Union to tip the balance of global power.

Brzezinski’s methods were anything but conventional. In 1978, he bypassed Secretary of State Cyrus Vance to meet directly with Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping in Beijing, a bold move that demonstrated his impatience with bureaucratic delays.

During these meetings, Brzezinski promised swift progress on normalization, effectively cornering Carter into action. He viewed the U.S.-China relationship not through the lens of economics or cultural exchange but as a linchpin for survival in a high-stakes geopolitical game.

For Brzezinski, the stakes weren’t just diplomatic; they were existential

Despite Carter’s inclination toward moral deliberation, Brzezinski’s relentless urgency forced decisions that might otherwise have stalled. His ability to push through resistance, both within the administration and in the broader diplomatic sphere, was pivotal to achieving normalization.

Vance: The Balancer

If Brzezinski was the firebrand, Cyrus Vance was the steady hand. As Secretary of State, Vance believed in a more cautious approach to normalization, one that respected Taiwan while recognizing Beijing. He was instrumental in crafting the Taiwan Relations Act, a piece of legislation that preserved unofficial ties with Taipei even as the U.S. formally recognized the PRC.

Vance’s diplomacy didn’t make headlines, but it laid the groundwork for stability in the region. His approach ensured that Carter’s decision wouldn’t burn bridges with Congress or alienate American allies in Asia. Together, Vance and Brzezinski’s opposing styles created a dynamic that propelled Carter to act, even if he wasn’t always sure how to proceed.

Beijing’s Calculated Charm Offensive

While Carter’s advisors were busy outmaneuvering each other, China had its own powerhouse team playing the long game. For Beijing, normalization wasn’t just a diplomatic win—it was a survival strategy.

By the late 1970s, the PRC was reeling from the economic and social chaos of the Cultural Revolution. Deng Xiaoping, China’s pragmatic leader, knew that engaging with the United States was the key to pulling his country out of the abyss.

Normalization wasn’t just about gaining global legitimacy; it was about securing access to Western technology, investment, and expertise.

Deng Xiaoping: The Visionary

Deng Xiaoping wasn’t just China’s leader—he was its lifeline. Emerging from the political purges of the Mao era, Deng understood that modernization wasn’t just a goal; it was a necessity for survival.

Faced with a nation battered by the chaos of the Cultural Revolution, he launched a series of sweeping reforms aimed at opening China’s economy to the world and revitalizing its political standing.

America, with its capitalist know-how, technological expertise, and deep pockets, became a cornerstone of Deng’s strategy. He recognized that forging a partnership with the United States would accelerate China’s transformation and provide a counterbalance to the looming Soviet threat.

Deng’s approach to normalization was equal parts pragmatism and theater. His historic visit to the United States in 1979—where he donned a cowboy hat at a Texas rodeo, marveled at NASA’s space technology, and shook hands with American business leaders—was a masterclass in public relations.

Beyond the photo ops, Deng carefully laid the groundwork for economic and diplomatic ties that would fuel China’s meteoric rise as a global superpower. By blending charm with strategic foresight, Deng not only won over the American public but also set the stage for decades of unprecedented growth and influence for China.

The Fallout and the Future

Normalization wasn’t without its messiness. The Taiwan Relations Act, passed by Congress in 1979, allowed the U.S. to maintain unofficial ties with Taipei, much to Beijing’s frustration. But for Deng and his team, it was a tolerable inconvenience.

They understood that the long-term benefits—economic growth, strategic alliances, and global legitimacy—far outweighed the short-term annoyances.

For Carter, normalization remains one of the few bright spots in an otherwise rocky presidency. But his role in the process was more facilitator than visionary. It was the combined efforts of Nixon, Kissinger, Brzezinski, Vance, and China’s diplomatic heavyweights that turned a fragile possibility into a historic reality.

Lessons for American Leadership

As we reflect on Carter’s legacy, one question looms: What can America learn from this chapter of history? For one, it underscores the importance of surrounding leaders with strong, capable advisors—and knowing when to let them take the reins.

Carter’s indecision may have been a liability, but the brilliance of his team ensured that the right moves were made, highlighting the necessity of delegation in complex decision-making.

From China’s perspective, the lesson is clear: Pragmatism and a long-term vision can turn even dire circumstances into opportunities. Deng Xiaoping’s ability to adapt, charm, and strategize reshaped China’s future in ways that still reverberate today.

His domestic reforms, combined with his international outreach, show how transformative leadership requires balancing internal priorities with global partnerships.

For future American leaders, perhaps the greatest takeaway is this: The best strategies blend moral clarity with calculated pragmatism. By learning from Nixon and Kissinger’s groundwork, Carter’s missteps, and Deng’s foresight, the U.S. can navigate a complex world with the kind of leadership that serves its people—not just its politics.

This moment in history reminds us that effective leadership lies not only in vision but in the ability to harness the strengths of a team and adapt to evolving circumstances.

Enjoyed this piece? 

Don’t keep it to yourself—like it, share it, and pass it along to someone who’d find it interesting.

Got thoughts, feedback, or just a “hey, nice job”? Drop us a comment. We’re here to build something worth your time, and every bit of feedback helps us sharpen our storytelling and deliver better, more engaging content straight to your inbox.

Oh, and if you haven’t subscribed yet, now’s your chance.