Xi Jinping’s Crossroads: The Perils of Centralized Power

Power in China has always been a delicate balancing act, and no one knows this better than Xi Jinping. In a country where history looms large, the lessons of emperors and bureaucrats aren’t dusty relics—they’re blueprints. Xi now stands at a pivotal crossroads: to eliminate factions entirely or to risk the chaos that unchecked centralization could bring.

A Long Tradition of Factionalism

Throughout China’s imperial history, factions weren’t just tolerated—they were engineered. Emperors understood the simple truth: a fractured elite is easier to manage than a unified one. By pitting factions against each other, rulers kept their throne secure, deflecting threats away from the center.

But here’s where things get interesting: while some dynasties leaned into meritocracy, as with the Song Dynasty’s infamous civil service exams, these systems often ended up reinforcing existing hierarchies. Sure, the exams gave rise to a more “meritocratic” elite, but they also heavily favored the wealthy. Landowning families had the resources to educate their sons, creating a bureaucratic class that remained deeply tied to local gentry.

These officials weren’t thinking about Beijing—they were thinking about their farms, their communities, their families. Their loyalty wasn’t to the emperor but to their own kin and hometowns. Paradoxically, this divided allegiance didn’t destabilize the central government outright. Instead, it fostered a decentralized stability: a slow burn where the emperor ruled from the center, and local elites managed the edges.

The Emperor’s Secret Weapon: Factions

When it came to keeping power, Chinese emperors were masters of strategy. One of their favorite tools? Factions. While it might seem counterintuitive, rulers actively encouraged factionalism. Why? Because when the elites were busy fighting one another, they weren’t fighting the emperor.

This practice wasn’t chaos; it was calculated. Factions created a kind of equilibrium—an internal check on ambition. And while infighting often bred inefficiency, it also diffused rebellion.

Fast forward to today, and Xi Jinping’s governance has echoes of this strategy—though with a crucial twist. His anti-corruption campaign has dismantled factional networks rather than balancing them. On the surface, it’s a bold move, signaling strength and unity. But factions, for all their messiness, have always been a ruler’s buffer. Without them, the elites’ frustrations can no longer be directed at each other. Instead, all discontent flows upward—to the leader.

The Risks of Centralized Power

Under Xi, the Chinese Communist Party has consolidated power to an extent unseen in decades. Decisions that once required consensus are now funneled through one man’s vision. This hyper-centralization allows for swift action, as seen in the pandemic response and sweeping economic reforms. Yet it comes at a cost.

When power is this centralized, failure is personal. The cracks in the system—inefficiencies, dissent, corruption—become magnified. History warns that leaders who destroy factions risk creating power vacuums. Without internal networks to share the burden, the ruler becomes the sole target of blame.

Xi’s current trajectory is precarious. Factions may be messy, but they stabilize the system. In their absence, China’s vast bureaucracy risks paralysis, its members too scared to act without direct orders.

The State and Society: A Marriage of Necessity

This brings us to one of the most enduring aspects of Chinese governance: the collaboration between state and society. In imperial times, local families often managed everything from disaster relief to public works. The state didn’t try to do it all—it couldn’t. Instead, it relied on grassroots efforts to function.

Modern China isn’t so different. While Xi’s top-down control is a hallmark of his rule, local networks remain vital. The pandemic response showcased this marriage of necessity. Neighborhood committees and local groups enforced lockdowns and distributed resources, proving that even in an era of centralization, the state still leans on society to survive.

But here lies another tension: Xi’s drive for centralized power risks weakening these grassroots networks. By concentrating authority in Beijing, the government may inadvertently erode the local collaboration that has always been key to stability.

Xi Jinping’s ‘Eye of Sauron’ Problem

Here’s the thing about Xi’s leadership: it’s incredibly effective when his focus is absolute. Think of it like the Eye of Sauron from The Lord of the Rings. When Xi turns his attention to a problem—whether it’s anti-corruption, poverty alleviation, or pandemic control—the machinery of the state moves with precision and force.

But the moment that focus shifts, the momentum falters. Without Xi’s direct oversight, cadres and bureaucrats lose their drive. They slack off, delay, or revert to old habits. This creates a system reliant on one man’s vision—a system that moves in bursts but struggles with sustained effort.

For a country as large and complex as China, this approach is risky. It leaves gaps—gaps where problems fester, gaps where resistance grows. The Emperor’s gaze might not always be sharp enough to catch what’s happening outside his narrow scope of attention.

The Crossroads of Modern China

Xi Jinping’s China is at a turning point. By eradicating factions, he has secured unparalleled control. But in doing so, he’s disrupted a centuries-old balancing act. The centralized power he wields so effectively is also a vulnerability, one that grows more precarious with every suppressed dissent, every dismantled network.

The echoes of the past are clear: power without balance is a dangerous path. For Xi, the challenge isn’t just maintaining control—it’s navigating the tensions of his own creation. The question now isn’t whether he can hold onto power, but whether the system he’s built can survive the weight of his rule.

Enjoyed this piece? Pass it on.

If this article made you think twice about power, history, or how Xi Jinping’s gaze is eerily similar to the Eye of Sauron, why not share it with a friend? They’ll thank you (or debate you), and we’ll get one step closer to bringing CHINAWAVE to more curious minds.

Don’t keep this to yourself. Copy the link, send it in a text, or yell it from the rooftops (WiFi permitting). And if they’re not already subscribed, invite them to hop on board. It’s free, it’s thought-provoking, and it beats doomscrolling Twitter.

Share the wave. 🌊